Sunday, March 22, 2009

Questions left over from 9/11

So what did really happen with 9/11? Because i personally believe there were too many incongruities that the government never answered or addressed in their report on 9/11. Just analyzing the sequences of events of 9/11 and the responses of the FBI and government officials from the vantage of logic, any discerning person would have to say there is a lot from the government's official reports that leave room for suspicion and dissatisfaction.

Just to look at some of the questions one could ask:

1. Why didn't Army jets intercept the attacking planes since they had numerous warnings of terrorist attacks? After all a country as intelligent and well advanced as the US had obviously foreseen such possibilities of a terrorist attack from the air and would have prepared for such an eventuality. Let's not forget the testimony that alleged that Vice President Dick knew and still kept the orders not to act standing.

2. Why did Ashcroft stop flying commercial, citing an unidentified "threat" in July 2001? Indeed why? From Bush to Condy Rice, those two-faced politicians were claiming that no one could have foreseen such an attack, but God knows, they all knew and had modeled some of their war games on such a scenario.

3. Why were there no photos or videos of the Pentagon plane? Sending all the salvaged steel to foreign countries, engine and wing pieces missing from the crash, all videos of the crime scene confiscated an those released showing nothing of the plane? I mean really? Am i the only one who smells a conspiracy?

4. Where was George Bush at the time of the attacks? Yes indeed, where was the country's valiant hero when the nation's most important monuments were under attack? Better yet, what was he doing when the army could have intercepted those jets and saved thousands of lives?

5. Where are the flight recorders? You know them, those nifty little gadgets that record conversation in the cockpit, radio communications between the cockpit crew and others (including conversation with air traffic control personnel), as well as ambient sounds. I wonder if someone had not contrived to make sure that they disappeared, whether their story of the the hijackers taking over the planes would have matched the 9/11 reports.

6. This has to be my biggest question. How did they come up with the "culprits" so quickly? By culprits i would be referring of course to those young Arabic lads educated from US flight schools and colleges, whose identities and guilt were so clearly discovered at the scene of the crimes, despite everything else including metal having been blown away. This would also be a good time to insert that some of these guilty, soulless terrorists, associated to Bin Ladin, that would have the nerve to attack the US, have of course been alleged to be still living and thriving on in the US. Luck them to have survived 9/11.

7. How extensive was the relationship between the Taliban, the ISI and the CIA? This question would of course have been prompted by the fact that General Mahmud Ahmad, former head of the ISI at that time, had been visiting the capital and meeting with government officials day before 9/11. Now it beats me, but why would the US government have been entertaining the very people who were to launch terrorists attacks on the nation? Even more suspicious was the $100, 000.00 that was supposedly transferred by this same general to a certain Mohammad Atta, which was later said to have been used to fund the attacks. Did i mention that this general had to quit his job soon after?

Now sarcasm aside, one must say there a number of red flags to be seen when looking at the 9/11 story. Its a shame to suspect one's own government of involvement in a tragedy that cost the lives of thousands and left many Americans scarred. Even more shameful would be that should 9/11 have been a conspiracy and a big hoax by the government then many innocent Arabs would have suffered needlessly, from those that were labeled hijackers to those that still suffer the stigma today. Whatever the nature of the truth, the events that occurred on 9/11 were too painful for many and too life threatening not to deserve total and absolute truth.

No comments:

Post a Comment